Prior to being a personal trainer Carlsbad, in the spring of 1991 I had been finishing my freshman year of studying engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle. One early morning my science professor went through a problem struggling with the First Law of Thermodynamics (also referred to as the conservation of energy). I did not know it during that time, but that morning would help figure my assumption years later that low-intensity “aerobic” activities are “exercises in futility.”
My professor demonstrated how to determine how many vertical feet you’d need to climb to be able to burn off the number of calories in a McDonald’s meal of a Big Mac, french fries, and milkshake. Calories in food are a measure of chemical energy, and that chemical energy might be developed into other forms such as the kinetic energy of moving your body or heat energy that will warm you. Take that meal from McDonald’s. I recently looked at their internet site, and it determines that between the Big Mac, chips, and big smoothie, that meal now contains a total of 2,150 calories. My teacher assumed a 25% functionality of the human body turning the meal calories into useable energy (the other 75% would be dissipated as wasted heat), and measured how high those calories would lift a person upward if 25% were converted into the possible strength of raising a mass with the power of gravity.
Brushing up on my fundamental physics equations to be able to publish this article, I re-did the same calculations my professor used and computed that a 150 lb . individual taking in the above McDonald’s meal has to climb 11,054 feet upward to melt away the 2,150 calories from that one snack. That doesn’t mean you’d melt it by jogging 11,054 feet. You’d need to climb a hill or a ladder that’s 11,054 feet high (or 2.09 miles high)! That is over 3 quarters of the way up Mt. Whitney (which is the tallest mountain in the continental US) in order to burn the calories from that single meal. The message of this story is not to climb a mountain every time you consume a meal, but alternatively to show that calories burnt from added training isn’t considerable when compared to the calories that could be found in meals.
Due to this fact, many “aerobics” workout programs haven’t shown a lot of effectiveness for aiding individuals to lose fat. The perfect fat burning results I’ve seen published are in the numbers of weight loss books by Ellington Darden, Ph.D. Darden applies a method for losing fat which concentrates on right eating plan and slow-motion high-intensity weight training. And, his weight loss groups do little, if any, “aerobic” activity. In all the years I have paid attention to fitness, I have not seen greater results documented elsewhere, and he has the standardized before and after pictures of his subjects throughout his books to confirm the efficiency of his method.
If “aerobic” exercise created a considerable contribution when it comes to weight loss, I’d expect to view evidence for it everywhere, since for years that is what many of the fitness industry has recommended for fat loss. You’d anticipate to see a large number of standardized before and after pictures of individuals performing primarily aerobics activities for losing fat and being successful at it, like Darden’s before and after photos from his strength training based programs. But I have not ever seen perfect examples of photographs like that from people involved in just an “aerobics” technique. Actually, as review for an exercise book printed in the 90’s, Edward Jackowski, Ph.D., interviewed more than 1,000 women who were longtime enthusiastic participants in aerobics dance classes, and one question he asked was “How many women, including yourself, do you know who have ever significantly improved their body by completing aerobics sessions?” Interestingly, all of the females had the exact same answer: “Zero.”
In any event, a great moral to take away from my science teacher’s computation is that changing eating methods can potentially have the single greatest result for weight loss out of any action a person can consider. In my own encounter of losing fifty lbs of fat and staying lean for going on 18 years, I could tell you that diet has contributed to my achievement with weight loss and maintenance more than anything else. I used to jog, step on the Stairmaster, and complete other low-intensity “aerobic” activities because I figured they were necessary to obtain and stay slim. I currently consider those to have been among the (many) faults that I’ve made in physical fitness. When I completely cut out running and other low-intensity “aerobic” activities from my workout routine, I did not get any heavier or any slimmer, and I did not get any stronger or any weaker. The only real change in my body was that my knees began feeling greater.
As a personal trainer Carlsbad, if you enjoy jogging or other low-intensity physical activities – more power to you. And successful resistance training could make you feel greater at those activities and perhaps make them more exciting for you too. Then again, I wouldn’t rely on them to help you lose fat. To burn body fat, diet program is most influential. And then strength training will help by shaping and firming your body, forces “discriminated weight loss” (weight loss, not muscle loss), and retains your metabolism as high as possible during and after the losing fat process. Trying to do added low-intensity “aerobic” activities won’t remove a sizeable amount of calories, and won’t perform much for the fat reduction process as an effect. So even for fat burning, 20 minutes, two times a week of high-intensity weight training is all the exercise you need.
Being in excellent condition through the help of personal trainer in Carlsbad not just enhances your physique but also your wellbeing too. The advantages that one can get from Carlsbad personal trainer are endless.
